POST /account/createVerifyKnown actor, fourth fingerprint this week
- Fingerprint rotated 4 times
- Commercial proxy exit IP
- Real browser, no automation
Comparison
Fingerprint is a device intelligence platform that returns a stable visitor identifier plus Smart Signals such as VPN, proxy, tampering and bot flags, which your team combines into its own logic. Kavra returns an explained assessment for every request: who is on the other end, what gave it away, and a recommended action your backend applies.
POST /account/createVerifyKnown actor, fourth fingerprint this week
Fingerprint describes itself as a device intelligence platform that identifies web and mobile visitors for fraud prevention, bot detection and personalization. Its core output is a visitor identifier that, according to Fingerprint, stays stable for months or years even when cookies are cleared. The commercial product collects more than 100 browser and device signals in the client and analyzes them on Fingerprint's servers together with network-level data.
On top of the identifier, Fingerprint sells Smart Signals: individual flags such as VPN, proxy (residential or datacenter), IP blocklist, anti-detect browser, incognito, tampering, virtual machine, browser bot, AI agent, velocity and, on mobile, Android emulator, iOS simulator, rooted and jailbroken devices. A Suspect Score sums the weights of the signals that fired. Fingerprint's documentation says the weights are based on how rarely each signal triggers globally, and that customers use the score to flag and review activity.
Fingerprint also maintains FingerprintJS, an MIT-licensed open-source library. Its own README says the open-source version runs only in the browser, is significantly less accurate than the commercial product and is vulnerable to spoofing, which matters if you plan to use it for fraud decisions.
Fingerprint hands you well-labeled ingredients. Kavra hands you the finished call. Every assessment carries a plain-language headline, the findings behind it, risk levels by domain (automation, impersonation, network, tampering, abuse), network context and a recommended action: allow, verify or block. Your backend still decides. You get the reasoning with it, so a fraud analyst or an engineer can read why a signup was stepped up without reverse-engineering a score.
Under that answer, Kavra analyzes 3,000+ data points per visit across network, device and environment, browser integrity, behavior, and identity and history, and an AI/ML risk engine weighs them together. The method is to look for contradictions between layers: a disguise that fools one layer rarely fools all of them. Three parts of that are worth calling out for teams comparing device intelligence tools.
Both products run invisibly in the page and leave the final decision to you. The difference is how much of the decision logic arrives ready to use.
| Kavra | Fingerprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Main output | Explained assessment with headline, findings, domain risk and recommended action | Visitor ID, Smart Signals and a Suspect Score |
| Who writes the decision logic | Kavra recommends; your backend applies or overrides | Your team combines signals into rules or models |
| Bot and automation detection | Across network, device, browser integrity and behavior, checked for contradictions | Browser Bot and AI Agent Smart Signals (web) |
| Antidetect browsers and VMs | Detected by contradictions between claimed and observed environment | Anti-Detect Browser, Tampering and Virtual Machine signals (web) |
| Proxy and VPN | Own measurement of commercial proxy exit IPs plus 30+ public feeds | VPN and Proxy signals covering residential and datacenter providers |
| Fingerprint changes | Rotation is a signal; the device stays one actor with N rotations | Identifier designed to stay stable across cookie clears; rotation handling not publicly documented as a separate signal |
| Real network connection | Seen on Kavra's own edge network | Network-level data analyzed server-side, per Fingerprint's README |
| Mobile | Native iOS and Android SDKs | iOS, Android and Flutter SDKs with mobile-only signals such as rooted, jailbroken, cloned app and geo spoofing |
| Open-source option | No | FingerprintJS, MIT license, browser-only |
| Data you must send | No names, emails or phone numbers; technical signals only (see privacy policy) | GDPR listed among the compliance standards on its website |
Fingerprint is a strong option when the identifier itself is the product you need. Be honest about which of these describes your team.
The two can also sit side by side. Some teams keep an existing visitor ID in their data warehouse and add Kavra's explained decision at the moments that cost money: signup, login, bonus claim and checkout.
One async script under 64 KB, loaded on the pages you want to protect. It never blocks rendering.
Send the signed, single-use token from the page to Kavra from your backend at signup, login or checkout.
Compare Kavra's findings with your current rules on real traffic before anything is blocked.
Allow, step up or block in your own code, and mark sessions or devices good or bad through the API as cases close.
Fingerprint and FingerprintJS are trademarks of their respective owner. This comparison is based on public information as of September 2026 and may change. Kavra Lab is not affiliated with Fingerprint.
How Kavra helps
One script and one API call give every request an explained answer.
Each assessment has a headline, findings, domain risk levels and a recommended action.
Network, device, browser integrity, behavior and history are checked against each other.
A device that keeps changing its fingerprint is tracked as one actor with N rotations.
Real exit IPs of commercial residential and mobile proxy networks, measured continuously.
Opaque visitor IDs, legal basis applied per visitor region, consent manager respected.
Kavra recommends and never blocks on its own. Start in observe-only mode.
FAQ
Something else? Talk to our team.
Fingerprint returns a visitor identifier plus Smart Signals and a Suspect Score, and your team turns those into rules. Kavra returns an explained assessment for each request with the findings behind it, risk by domain and a recommended action. Both leave the final decision to your backend. The difference is how much decision logic you build yourself.
Fingerprint's own README says the open-source FingerprintJS runs only in the browser, is significantly less accurate than its commercial product and is vulnerable to spoofing and reverse engineering. That makes it fine for analytics or light personalization, but fraud teams usually need server-side analysis that a fraudster cannot read or rewrite in the page.
Yes. They do not conflict in the page. A common pattern is to keep an existing visitor ID in your data warehouse for analytics and models, and use Kavra's explained allow, verify or block recommendation at signup, login, bonus claim and checkout, where a readable reason matters for reviews and appeals.
It helps, but operators rotate fingerprints, use fresh browser profiles and route each account through a different proxy. You also need to recognize the rotation itself, the proxy network and contradictions between layers. Kavra keeps a rotating device as one actor and links accounts that share it, so a new-looking profile does not reset the history.
No. Kavra needs no name, email or phone number to assess a request. It processes technical and network signals from the visit, such as the IP address and browser properties, which can count as personal data under GDPR; that processing, the roles of each party and retention are described in our privacy policy. Visitor IDs are pseudonymous, the fingerprint is never the identifier, and each customer's data is isolated.
Run Kavra on your own traffic in observe-only mode. No risk to your customers, and a clear report of the fraud it finds.